Malheur Experiment Station
Oregon State University
Information for Sustainable Agriculture

SUGAR BEET VARIETY TRIALS, 2010

Lamont D. Saunders, and Clinton C. Shock, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR


Introduction

The sugar beet industry in southern Idaho and eastern Oregon, in cooperation with Oregon State University (OSU), tests sugar beet varieties at multiple locations each year to identify varieties with high sugar yield and root quality. A seed advisory committee evaluates the data each year and selects the best varieties for sugar production. This report provides the agronomic practices and results for the OSU Malheur Experiment Station at Ontario in 2010.


Methods

The 2010 sugar beet trials were grown on Owyhee silt loam soil where winter wheat was the previous crop. The wheat stubble was shredded and the field was irrigated and disked. Soil analysis showed pH of 8.0, 18 lb total nitrogen (N)/acre as nitrate in the first foot of soil, low sulfates at 18 ppm, and low manganese (Mn) at 6ppm. Potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), and boron (B) were adequate. Based on soil analyses and estimated crop needs, the field received no fall fertilizer. The field was ripped, plowed, and worked down before the field was bedded in 22-inch beds on November 27, 2009. There was no fumigation treatment.

Sugar beets were planted on April 6, 2010 at a seeding rate of 8 viable seed/ft of row. Plots of each variety were 4 rows wide (22-inch row spacing) by 23 ft long, with a 4-ft alley separating each tier of plots. Each variety was replicated eight times in a randomized complete block design.

On April 14, Counter® 15G was applied in a 4-inch band over each row at 7.4 lb/acre. Soil moisture was monitored using Watermark soil moisture sensors. Soil moisture was maintained at a soil water tension wetter than 70 cb at 8-inch depth in the middle of the beet row for the duration of the season.

Beets began to emerge on April 18, and were fully emerged by April 27. The entire trial was broadcast sprayed with Buccaneer Plus™ at 48 oz/acre on May 19 when beets were in the 6-true-leaf stage. The spray solution contained 5 percent AMS (ammonium sulfate) as well as a non-ionic surfactant and was applied at 30 gal/acre. Seedlings were thinned by hand to 1 plant per 7 inches on May 26. On June 2, urea was side dressed to supply 170 lb N/acre.

The field was sidedressed with Temik® at 10 lb/acre on June 2 and irrigated on June 3 to control sugar beet root maggot. On June 24, the trial was broadcast sprayed with Buccaneer Plus at 32 oz/acre. The spray solution contained 5 percent AMS as well as a non-ionic surfactant and at a spray rate of 30 gal/acre. This application was made using 110-degree flat fan spray nozzles mounted on the back of corrugator slicks with the spray directed upwards. This directional spray facilitated getting the herbicide under the canopy and was effective in spraying the weeds that had escaped because they had been protected from overhead in the previous spray application by the sugar beet canopy.

To control powdery mildew, Proline® fungicide at 5 oz/acre with 5 lb sulfur (S) were applied on June 26 and Headline® fungicide was applied at 12 oz/acre with 5 lb S/acre on July 18. Petiole tests were taken on July 16 and July 29. Based on petiole analyses, manganese (Che-Man 5% chelated) at .25 lb/acre, zinc (Che-Zinc 9% chelated) at 0.2 lb/acre, boron (liquid boron 10%) at 0.1 lb/acre and foliar S at 1.5 lb/acre was added to the fungicide application on July 18.

Beets were harvested October 12-13, 2010. The foliage was flailed and the crowns were removed with rotating disks. All sugar beets in the center two rows of each plot were dug with a two-row wheel-lifter harvester, weighed, and two eight-beet samples were taken from each plot. Samples were transported daily to the Snake River Sugar factory for laboratory analysis of sucrose, nitrate, and conductivity. The root weight data were examined for outliers as is customary for calculations of sugar beet variety data in these trials. The data for each plot with two samples were averaged for analysis. Sugar sample data were checked for errors in sugar percentages and conductivity. Any erroneous sample readings were deleted from the data set. Observations more than two standard deviations from the mean for each variety were deleted.

Sugar concentrations were "factored" by multiplying measured sucrose by 0.98 to compensate for the sugar that would have been lost to respiration if the beets had been stored in a pile. The percent extraction was calculated using the formula:

Ext = 250 + [(1,255.2·Cond) - (15,000·Sug) - 6,185] / Sug (98.66 - 7.845·Cond) where Ext is percent extraction, Cond is the electrical conductivity in mmho, and Sug is the sucrose concentration in percent.

Variety differences in yield, sucrose content, conductivity, percent extraction, and estimated recoverable sugar were calculated using least-squares means analysis. The varieties were listed in the tables of results in descending order of estimated recoverable sugar. Reports of previous years' Oregon State University variety trials are available online at www.cropinfo.net.


Results

Variety results were grouped by estimated recoverable sugar. Root yield for beet varieties in the Commercial Trial averaged 45.79 tared ton/acre and 17.93 percent sugar content (Table 1). Sugar beets with the highest root yield in the Commercial Trial included varieties Crystal RR968 (51.33 ton/acre), BTS 26RR14, Crystal RR933, and HM 9036RR. Among those with the highest recoverable sugar per acre were varieties Crystal RR968 (15,370 lb/acre), BTS 26RR14, HM 9036RR, Crystal RR892, Crystal RR933 and HH SV36602RR.

Root yield in the Experimental Trial averaged 46.48 tared ton/acre and 17.86 percent sugar content (Table 2). Sugar beets with the highest root yield included varieties HM RP9246RR (54.08 ton/acre), BTS 20RR28, and BTS 20RR63. Varieties with the highest recoverable sugar per acre included BTS 20RR28 (16,017 lb/acre), HM RP9246RR, HH SV36005RR, BTS 20RR15, and BTS 20RR63.

Table 1. Commercial Roundup Ready® sugar beet variety performance in the Amalgamated Sugar Co. LLC Variety Trial at the Oregon State University Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, Oregon, 2010.


Root

yield

Sugar

content

Gross

sugar

Conduc-

tivity

Extrac-

tion

Estimated

recoverable sugar


 

(tons/acre)

(%)

(lb/acre)

(mmhos)

(%)

(lb/ton)

(lb/acre)

 

 








 

Crystal RR968

51.33

17.51

17,975

0.718

85.52

299.5

15,370

a

BTS 26RR14

51.17

17.48

17,885

0.707

85.65

299.4

15,318

a

HM 9036RR

49.62

17.60

17,467

0.668

86.19

303.5

15,054

ab

Crystal RR892

48.21

18.05

17,402

0.726

85.50

308.6

14,877

abc

Crystal RR933

50.04

17.35

17,349

0.748

85.09

295.3

14,763

a-d

HH SV36602RR

47.08

18.10

17,043

0.702

85.83

310.7

14,625

a-e

HH SV36601RR

46.56

17.93

16,696

0.651

86.45

310.0

14,435

b-f

BTS 27RR10

48.17

17.63

16,980

0.807

84.36

297.5

14,323

b-g

BTS 28RR04

48.49

17.27

16,743

0.748

85.07

293.9

14,243

c-h

HH SV36803RR

46.35

17.83

16,532

0.684

86.01

306.8

14,219

c-h

HH SV36902RR

43.77

18.79

16,450

0.671

86.35

324.5

14,205

c-h

Crystal RR922

47.60

17.57

16,720

0.772

84.81

298.0

14,181

c-h

BTS 27RR20

44.14

18.58

16,400

0.714

85.75

318.7

14,067

d-i

HH SV36603RR

44.53

18.19

16,193

0.647

86.56

315.0

14,016

d-i

Crystal RR989

47.28

17.41

16,452

0.750

85.07

296.2

13,996

d-i

BTS 28RR4N

43.71

18.47

16,136

0.648

86.60

319.9

13,971

d-j

Crystal RR880

45.17

17.81

16,098

0.654

86.40

307.7

13,912

e-j

HM RP9120RR

46.12

17.74

16,361

0.766

84.93

301.4

13,895

e-j

Crystal RR835

43.31

18.58

16,096

0.708

85.84

319.0

13,817

f-k

HM 9047RR

43.63

18.13

15,820

0.643

86.61

314.1

13,699

f-l

Crystal RR929

42.02

18.52

15,568

0.578

87.51

324.2

13,624

g-l

Crystal RR876

44.34

17.67

15,669

0.673

86.13

304.4

13,497

h-l

HH SV36801RR

44.31

17.73

15,709

0.697

85.83

304.3

13,483

h-l

HM 9124RR

41.78

18.21

15,245

0.581

87.41

318.4

13,331

i-l

HM PM9122RR

43.32

17.75

15,382

0.705

85.73

304.4

13,187

jkl

BTS 28RR24

40.53

18.56

15,044

0.633

86.81

322.2

13,061

kl

Crystal 9930RR

43.58

17.61

15,329

0.770

84.84

298.8

13,005

l

LSD (0.05)

2.47

0.39

917

0.040

0.56

7.9

805

 

Grand mean

45.79

17.93

16,401

0.695

85.88

308.0

14,083

 





Table 2. Experimental Roundup Ready sugar beet variety performance in the Amalgamated Sugar Co. LLC Variety Trial at the Oregon State University Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, Oregon, 2010.


Root

yield

Sugar

content

Gross

sugar

Conduc-

tivity

Extrac-

tion

Estimated

recoverable sugar





(ton/acre)

(%)

(lb/acre)

(mmhos)

(%)

(lb/ton)

(lb/acre)

 










BTS 20RR28

52.24

17.80

18,601

0.676

86.12

306.7

16,017

a

HM RP9246RR

54.08

16.83

18,206

0.700

85.61

288.2

15,587

ab

HH SV36005RR

48.33

18.48

17,854

0.596

87.26

322.6

15,581

ab

BTS 20RR15

48.88

18.32

17,901

0.685

86.09

315.4

15,410

abc

BTS 20RR63

51.01

17.53

17,884

0.716

85.55

299.9

15,300

a-d

HM RP9240RR

49.59

17.65

17,496

0.694

85.85

303.1

15,021

b-e

HM 9036RR

49.23

17.59

17,329

0.634

86.61

304.7

15,013

b-e

HM PM9248RR

49.93

17.47

17,445

0.695

85.81

299.8

14,968

b-e

Crystal RR968

50.76

17.18

17,426

0.703

85.64

294.3

14,923

b-e

BTS 29RR49

46.15

18.70

17,272

0.682

86.19

322.4

14,885

b-f

Crystal RR088

48.15

17.88

17,212

0.686

86.00

307.6

14,802

b-f

HM 9294RR

47.09

18.09

17,038

0.676

86.16

311.7

14,681

b-f

BTS 29RR3N

45.70

18.38

16,802

0.587

87.37

321.2

14,681

b-f

BTS 27RR20

45.17

18.68

16,865

0.684

86.16

321.8

14,530

c-f

SX 1583RR

44.94

18.50

16,629

0.597

87.25

322.9

14,511

c-g

HH SV36901RR

45.20

18.43

16,680

0.638

86.71

319.7

14,470

d-g

Crystal RR047

49.39

17.10

16,895

0.720

85.41

292.1

14,430

d-g

SX 1502RR

45.60

18.28

16,670

0.651

86.52

316.3

14,424

d-g

HM RP9247RR

47.44

17.43

16,533

0.629

86.66

302.1

14,328

e-h

SX 1503RR

45.04

18.18

16,364

0.631

86.77

315.5

14,196

e-i

HH SV36601RR

45.27

18.06

16,353

0.640

86.63

312.8

14,167

e-i

HH SV36004RR

43.07

18.61

16,030

0.593

87.33

325.0

14,001

f-j

SX 1504NRR

46.04

17.61

16,215

0.658

86.31

304.0

13,995

f-j

HM 9242RR

44.16

17.83

15,756

0.656

86.38

308.1

13,611

g-k

HM PM9243RR

46.07

17.04

15,698

0.682

85.89

292.7

13,491

h-k

HM PM9172RR

43.99

17.70

15,573

0.651

86.41

305.9

13,458

h-k

HM 9296RR

44.28

17.67

15,645

0.711

85.63

302.7

13,398

ijk

HM PM9244RR

43.63

17.64

15,391

0.628

86.71

305.9

13,348

ijk

HM 9295RR

42.37

17.83

15,106

0.634

86.66

309.0

13,091

jkl

HM RT9241RR

42.72

17.51

14,960

0.672

86.11

301.6

12,886

kl

BTS 36RR11

41.53

18.16

15,079

0.761

85.06

309.0

12,832

kl

HM NT9245RR

41.15

17.55

14,442

0.676

86.06

302.1

12,429

l

LSD (0.05)

2.69

0.41

1026

0.040

0.55

8.1

914


Grand mean

46.48

17.86

16,592

0.664

86.28

308.3

14,316

 


Cite as:


Saunders, L.D. and C.C. Shock. 2011. Sugar Beet Variety Trials, 2010. p 145-148. In Shock C.C. (Ed.) Oregon State University Agricultural Experiment Station, Malheur Experiment Station Annual Report 2010, Department of Crop and Soil Science Ext/CrS 132.



Home Crops Weather Potato Blight Water Quality Irrigation Weeds Search

MES Publications, MES Notice of events, Vegetation,Malheur County, Leslie Gulch,Succor Creek,Owyhee River,Local wildlife,Strawberry Mountain, Eagle Caps

For additional information about the Malheur Agricultural Experiment Station, please send an e-mail request to:
Dr. Clinton C. Shock
Clinton.Shock@oregonstate.edu


Malheur Agricultural Experiment Station

595 Onion Avenue
Ontario, OR 97914
(541) 889-2174

FAX (541) 889-7831
 
Malheur Experiment Station Web Site Purpose and Policy OSU Home Page OSU disclaimer

Last updated  Friday September 2, 2011.